Jump to content

TT: Showalter should be leery on how he uses Johnson


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It has been evident for some time, that despite rhetoric to the contrary, Buck is firmly entrenched in the current usage of specialized relief pitching. Barring extreme circumstances Buck will go to Johnson when it is a save situation. The O's have 29 saves as a team, 27 by Johnson. Of the other two saves one is of the three inning variety.

Johnson will need to have a meltdown of Greggian proportions for Buck to remove him from the role, and if that happens then in short order Johnson's replacement, be it Hunter or O'Day, will exhibit a similar usage pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot that goes into these decisions. I think Buck's decision to use JJ was defensible, because even though he was pitching for three days in a row, he hadn't pitched for five days before that. On the other hand, he had struggled a bit the two previous nights, throwing 23 pitches in each outing, which is much higher than normal for him. If you look at the other two times he threw three days in a row:

April 22-24: 13 and 14 pitches the two previous days.

June 9-11: 9 and 9 pitches the two previous days.

For me, this was a borderline call. I can see the argument for going with Hunter (not O'Day, who is scuffling a bit right now) there. But I'm not going to fault Buck too much for going with a guy who had reeled off 12 saves in a row and allowed 1 run in 14 appearances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot that goes into these decisions. I think Buck's decision to use JJ was defensible, because even though he was pitching for three days in a row, he hadn't pitched for five days before that. On the other hand, he had struggled a bit the two previous nights, throwing 23 pitches in each outing, which is much higher than normal for him. If you look at the other two times he threw three days in a row:

April 22-24: 13 and 14 pitches the two previous days.

June 9-11: 9 and 9 pitches the two previous days.

For me, this was a borderline call. I can see the argument for going with Hunter (not O'Day, who is scuffling a bit right now) there. But I'm not going to fault Buck too much for going with a guy who had reeled off 12 saves in a row and allowed 1 run in 14 appearances.

How much rest can you "save up"? Is not working for five days any more beneficial then not working for three days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Gregg Olson when he was the closer, and they didnt keep blown save records then, but the year he saved 37, he also lost 5 games. The year before that, he saved 31 and lost 6.

It happens.

They are not yet at the halfway mark in the season. Is it going to be OK if he ends up blowing 12 saves for the year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously?

If I was Buck, you keep running him out, he is leading both leagues in saves and opportunities for saves.

All closers will blow some, it's the nature of the game.

How many games have the Orioles won against the opposing closer over the years?

Seriously.

Many managers refused to pitch a reliever on 3 consecutive days. And for a guy like Jim Johnson, who is only effective when his sinker is sinking and he is low in the strike zone, control and movement is paramount. Fatigue affects control and movement, it doesn't affect velocity normally.

I was watching Johnson throwing his warm up pitches on the mound last night and I told my girlfriend, "He is going to blow it." Why did I say that? Almost all of his pitches, including his last one was high and out of the zone. What happens against his first batter? A walk on 4 balls high and out of the zone. Then he offers up a belt high meatball to Giambi and it was game over, even though he eventually found his stuff--it was too late.

Johnson might be a guy you have to coddle in order to get the best out him, because even at his best he is not going to be a guy who gets himself into trouble and can strike out the side to make up for it. If he's more than a jot off, Jim Johnson isn't an effective closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a lot that goes into these decisions. I think Buck's decision to use JJ was defensible, because even though he was pitching for three days in a row, he hadn't pitched for five days before that. On the other hand, he had struggled a bit the two previous nights, throwing 23 pitches in each outing, which is much higher than normal for him. If you look at the other two times he threw three days in a row:

April 22-24: 13 and 14 pitches the two previous days.

June 9-11: 9 and 9 pitches the two previous days.

For me, this was a borderline call. I can see the argument for going with Hunter (not O'Day, who is scuffling a bit right now) there. But I'm not going to fault Buck too much for going with a guy who had reeled off 12 saves in a row and allowed 1 run in 14 appearances.

I remember Gregg Olson when he was the closer, and they didnt keep blown save records then, but the year he saved 37, he also lost 5 games. The year before that, he saved 31 and lost 6.

It happens.

I don't think this is an issue of whether or not anyone thinks JJ is good or reliable. But let's say he closed down the game last night with the save and we won. Maybe he threw about 20 pitches to end the game. And now tonight, we are in another save situation. Surely Buck would not extend him to four days in a row. So you have to draw the line somewhere, and when the evidence shows that he's significantly less effective when working a third day in a row, you have to go to someone else. It's not like our bullpen is JJ and a bunch of duds right now. Maybe you let Matusz go a 2nd inning. If you really want to keep him fresh, you can put in Hunter. There are options (heck, Patton and Hunter were warming in the 9th as the meltdown got going).

It's frustrating because it's akin to last year's "leaving the starter in for one inning too long" fiasco. I understand what Buck is trying to accomplish in those situations, but it just seemed to happen without fail that trying to get the extra inning when the starter completed the previous inning on fumes was going to result in disaster. So what I'm saying is that it seems preventable, and while Buck has forgotten more about baseball than I'll ever know, it's frustrating to see the same mistakes repeated throughout the course of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not yet at the halfway mark in the season. Is it going to be OK if he ends up blowing 12 saves for the year?

There are multiple closers with 3 blown at this stage, and less opportunities.

Lets not drink the kool-aid.

This team is still 7 games over .500,

Go back tonight, with Gonzalez and get back in the win column.

If they can get back to taking two out of three, they will be just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are multiple closers with 3 blown at this stage, and less opportunities.

Lets not drink the kool-aid.

This team is still 7 games over .500,

Go back tonight, with Gonzalez and get back in the win column.

If they can get back to taking two out of three, they will be just fine.

Johnson has more then three blown saves.

Seven games over .500 is good enough for third place and home for the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson has more then three blown saves.

Seven games over .500 is good enough for third place and home for the playoffs.

Actually before the Tribe, they were 7 games above .500 and in 2nd place and with the better record and the number 1 wild card slot.

There is a lot of baseball to play.

Go Birds!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...